Use of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells

The Blood Service prepared Guidelines for the Use of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells. These were endorsed by the National Blood Transfusion Committee on 15 February 2008.

Purpose

To provide recommendations for the use of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells in order to conserve stocks and ensure availability for those patients for whom there is no alternative. 

To provide a framework that is designed to ensure that hospitals and pathology providers work in a consistent, integrated manner to manage shortages of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells.

Background

Every blood service has encountered recurrent shortfalls of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells. This is predictable to some extent given that Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells are justifiably given to some non-Group O Rh(D)-negative recipients, for example in emergencies before the patient's blood group is known.

The Blood Service strives to collect a higher percentage of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells than is present in the donor population.

Between 7% to 8% of Australian blood donors are Group O Rh(D)-negative, whilst the Blood Service issues of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells represent between 10% to 12% of total red cell issues.

This means that the donation frequency rate has to be high from these donors to keep up with demand.

Further enhancements of Group O Rh(D)-negative collections would be both difficult and costly.

General principles

  1. Adequate stock management policies should be in place to minimise wastage of Group O Rh(D)-negative red cells arising from time expiry, and to avoid the need to electively transfuse to non-Group O recipients to prevent time expiry.

  2. Adequate stocks of other groups should be maintained by hospitals to avoid the unnecessary use of Group O Rh(D)-negative blood for patients with other groups.

  3. Sensitisation to the D antigen through blood transfusion must, where possible, always be avoided in women with child-bearing potential (<50 years when unknown). These guidelines aim to ensure continuous supply for this patient group.

Indications for the Use of Group O Rh(D)-negative Red Cells

Mandatory

  • Group O Rh(D)-negative patients with anti-D

  • Group O Rh(D)-negative females with child-bearing potential

  • In emergency to premenopausal (<50 years) females of unknown blood group

  • Group O Rh (D)-negative children (males and females < 16 years)

Recommended

  • Group O Rh (D)-negative patients who will receive repeated transfusions, or are likely to become transfusion-dependent

    • For example: patients with hemoglobinopathies, aplastic anaemia, myelodysplasia

Acceptable

  • In an emergency situation, Group O Rh(D)-negative blood should be given while the patient's blood group is being established

    • Blood grouping should be carried out as quickly as possible to minimise the 'blind' use of Group O Rh(D)-negative blood, and this can be limited to no more than two units in most instances

    • Once the patient's blood group has been determined, a switch to group specific blood should be made

  • If blood for neonatal use is required and suitable group specific red cells are unavailable

  • If the specific phenotyped blood provided is Group O Rh(D)-negative

Use of Group O Rh(D)-positive for Group O Rh(D)-negative patients

  • In order to conserve stocks of Group O Rh(D)-negative blood, Group O Rh(D)-positive blood should be used in larger volume blood replacement (eg, more than 6–10 units of blood) in females with no child-bearing potential and adult males who do not have an existing or historical anti-D.

  • When Group O Rh(D)-negative blood is unavailable or in extremely short supply, it is acceptable to use Group O Rh(D)-positive red cells for Group O Rh(D)-negative female patients with no child-bearing potential and unimmunised males, provided no anti-D is detected on pretransfusion testing.

    • It should be noted that although there is a theoretical possibility that in a sensitised Rh(D)-negative patient, anti-D could fall after many years to an undetectable level, this is highly unusual with current sensitive screening techniques.